Trump links Greenland push to Nobel snub as EU readies €93-billion tariff response
President Trump tied his bid for Greenland to a Nobel Peace Prize disappointment, saying he can now ‘think about what is good and proper’ for the U.S., while the EU considers retaliatory tariffs.
Copy link
By Torontoer Staff
U.S. President Donald Trump said his effort to acquire Greenland was linked to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize, declaring he no longer thought “purely of Peace” and could consider what was “good and proper for the United States.” The comment comes as the European Union prepares possible retaliatory measures, including tariffs covering about €93 billion of U.S. imports.
The dispute over Greenland has escalated into a diplomatic and economic flashpoint that risks further straining NATO ties and reviving a transatlantic trade fight. EU leaders will meet at an emergency summit to weigh options after Trump threatened to raise tariffs on several European countries starting February 1 unless the U.S. is allowed to buy the Arctic island.
What Trump told Norway’s prime minister
In a written message to Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, seen by Reuters, Trump tied his Greenland drive to the Nobel Committee’s choice. He referenced his role in ending wars and said the committee’s decision freed him to prioritise U.S. interests alongside peace.
Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.
Donald Trump
Trump also renewed arguments that Denmark cannot adequately defend Greenland against rivals such as Russia or China and wrote that the world would not be secure unless the U.S. had “Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”
... and why do they have a ’right of ownership’ anyway?
Donald Trump
EU’s options and the risk of automatic tariffs
European leaders are considering several responses at the Brussels summit, including a package of retaliatory tariffs that could automatically take effect on February 6, after a six-month suspension, unless negotiations alter the outcome. Officials also expect to discuss the bloc’s rarely used Anti-Coercion Instrument, which could limit access to public tenders or restrict trade in services where the U.S. runs a surplus.
- Possible tariffs on about €93 billion of U.S. imports, with an automatic trigger on February 6
- Use of the Anti-Coercion Instrument to restrict public tenders, investment or services
- Diplomatic engagement at multiple levels and discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos
Germany and France agree: we will not allow ourselves to be blackmailed.
German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil
EU officials said dialogue with the U.S. would continue, but they made clear they would not accept coercive measures that reshape trade relations without consequence.
Security implications for NATO and Arctic policy
Denmark, a NATO ally, has rejected Trump’s overtures, treating Greenland as part of the kingdom. The episode has added friction to an alliance already challenged by the war in Ukraine and disputes over defence spending. Canada has said it plans to send soldiers to Greenland as a show of solidarity with Denmark.
Strategic interest in Greenland has grown as Arctic sea routes open and rival powers extend their presence in the region. European officials and defence experts say the dispute highlights the need for clearer Arctic policy and stronger cooperation among allies.
Markets, industry and corporate concern
Markets reacted nervously to the standoff. European stock indices fell and the dollar weakened as investors moved into safe-haven assets. Analysts warned that renewed tariff measures could reintroduce the volatility seen during last year’s trade disputes, disrupting supply chains and cross-border investment.
This latest flashpoint has heightened concerns over a potential unravelling of NATO alliances and the disruption of last year’s trade agreements with several European nations.
Tony Sycamore, market analyst, IG
Industry leaders say the episode may accelerate European efforts to build greater independence in strategic sectors. Oliver Burkhard, CEO of submarine maker TKMS, told Reuters that shifting transatlantic ties should encourage Europe to focus on its own capabilities.
Key dates and what to watch
- February 1: Trump said he would start increasing tariffs on selected European nations if Greenland is not sold to the U.S.
- February 6: Potential automatic trigger date for retaliatory EU tariffs after a six-month suspension
- World Economic Forum in Davos: Trump will give a keynote address that could shape diplomatic momentum
The coming days will test whether diplomacy can contain the dispute or whether economic measures will become the primary tool of response. The EU summit and Davos are likely to set the tone for transatlantic relations in the near term.
For residents and businesses with ties across the Atlantic, the immediate concern is practical: tariffs and trade restrictions would raise costs and create uncertainty. For policymakers, the challenge is preserving alliance cohesion while protecting national and regional interests.
Expect continued diplomatic outreach, market sensitivity to announcements from Brussels and Washington, and close attention to any military or security steps around Greenland. The dispute is small in geography, but large in its potential consequences for trade and alliance politics.
GreenlandDonald TrumpEuropean UniontradeNATO
